LSD ‘neurotoxicity’

Call LSD ‘neurotoxic’ in a psychedelic community and see how far that gets you. You’ll probably evoke some laughter, maybe some scorn, but not much else.

For the millions of people who take LSD and similar psychedelics every year, and the tens of millions who have taken LSD since its explosion into mainstream culture in the 1960s, LSD is not a toxic drug. There have been absolutely no documented deaths from LSD overdose; the closest we’ve come was a group of partiers who snorted pure LSD crystal by accident, ingesting thousands of times a normal dose. They suffered some nasty physical effects including diarrhea and seizures, but they all survived. They didn’t even suffer any major psychological difficulties in the years following the event.


The psychological dangers of LSD are another story. Although we’ve moved past the proved-to-be-false scare stories of kids being blinded by the sun or jumping out of windows, psychedelics really do dramatically alter your perception of reality, and can certainly do some harm to your mind if used irresponsibly.

It’s these psychological harms that have been investigated in a recent study looking back at the hundreds of people who were given LSD in hospitals in the 60s and 70s in Denmark.

The study is titled “Neurotoxicity and LSD Treatment”, which is immediately a red flag. Neurotoxicity means that a substance is directly harming neurons, causing cell death through harmful interactions with receptors or signalling pathways: but there is no evidence to suggest that LSD can damage adult neurons at normal dosages. This study is already misleading.

The study deals with the roughly 400 people who were treated with LSD in Danish psychiatric hospitals, around 150 later complained of negative side effects. The records of these patients are the only ones available, so we don’t know what the positive effects were in the 250 other patients.

The core reason that so many of these patients suffered from negative psychological consequences of LSD use is because they were already suffering from mental health issues. There has been much discussion of the potential dangers of people with psychosis taking psychedelic drugs, and this study seems to back up the idea that psychotic patients could have their symptoms exacerbated by psychedelic use.

This does not mean that LSD is unsafe; only that it is potentially unsafe to use on people with psychosis or severe mental health issues.

There are many other reasons why so many patients suffered negative consequences of LSD use. Most of the patients had more than ten sessions with LSD, over the course of a few weeks – this is certainly too much, and most modern psychonauts will recommend taking breaks of several weeks (even months) between significant LSD experiences. Not only this, but participants were often given huge doses of LSD, always above 100ug, and sometimes as much as 800ug – these are doses that most psychonauts would not recommend for anyone.


Even though LSD was administered in a clinical setting, it was given at very high doses and to patients with existing psychotic symptoms.

Something that confounds the results somewhat is that these 150 people were specifically applying for monetary compensation from the government. This means that even people who benefited overall from LSD treatment could claim that they had some negative side effects. One person claimed that LSD gave them flashbacks and anxiety, even though the LSD treatment had helped their mental health condition, and they would recommend it as a treatment. It was even determined that some of the anxiety this person suffered was as a result of the preexisting mental health condition – but they still got compensation from the government.

Clearly the situation is not as simple as “150/400 people treated with LSD will experience negative consequences”. The real story is: “When you give repeated large doses of LSD to patients suffering from mental health issues, without adequate support and consideration, a certain percentage of those people may suffer an exacerbation of their previous mental health conditions.”

But that wouldn’t make a great headline.

Just remember; LSD is a powerful drug and it’s always important to consider the context in which it’s taken. But LSD is not neurotoxic, and is relatively harmless for the vast majority of sensible users.


2 thoughts on “LSD ‘neurotoxicity’

  1. Lately, people believe anything on a “scientific reports”. But some scientists are council ass-kisser and their study is not reliable. I think those pseudo scientists knows they are not smart enough to get formal attentions among “real” scientists so that they bias their study towards government statements to get funded.

    I really really hate those people. When I was a kid I believed that politicians, priests, celebrities, commentator, police force, army and even court do tell a lie but scientist don’t. Now I also add some of “scientists” in this list. Scientists have to be honest for their studies even if it goes against everybody else in the world. That’s an honor of scientists and it’s the only reason why those people can affect government policy without direct involvement of democracy.

    I think modern day science needs more strict verification *completely* independent from any government or council. Unless science itself lost it’s credibility sooner or later (and what can we believe then?)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s